Introduction: A Figure of Concern in Financial Circles
Table of Contents
Kevin Canterbury (CRD# 4939385), once a respected name in Scottsdale’s financial landscape, is currently enveloped in a fog of unsettling controversy. A spate of investor complaints alleges that he has engaged in significant financial misconduct, causing his clients losses that reach into the six-figure range. Why is Canterbury’s name now synonymous with caution in law enforcement and financial circles?
The Professional Background of Kevin Canterbury
According to official records from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Canterbury previously worked as a broker at Coastal Equities. Presently, he serves as an investment advisor at CS Planning Corporation.
The Not-So-Glittering Track Record
Canterbury’s BrokerCheck report, a vital tool for assessing a financial advisor’s credibility, presents a less than flattering image. It contains:
- Four investor grievances
- Recurring allegations of recommending unsuitable direct investments
These alarming details lead us to question: Can experience compensate for a troubling record of complaints?
The Litany of Complaints: Patterns Emerge
To understand the gravity of the situation, it’s crucial to delve into the specifics of the grievances:
- July 2023: The latest complaint alleges Canterbury’s advice led to unsuitable direct investments, with potential damages amounting to $100,000. The case is still under review.
- 2018: A case was made against Canterbury for recommending unsuitable securities between 2013 and 2016. The case concluded with a settlement of $60,000 in 2020.
- 2019: Canterbury faced accusations once again for recommending unsuitable investments. A settlement was reached for $52,140.47 in 2021.
- 2020: The complaint filed detailed his advice on unsuitable alternative investments between 2014 and 2016. The matter was eventually settled for $50,000 in 2021.
Does Experience Justify Trust?
Records from the FINRA and SEC show that Canterbury has been in the securities industry for 17 years. He has affiliations with several firms, namely:
- Coastal Equities (Scottsdale, Arizona; 2012-2020)
- Mutual Securities (Scottsdale, Arizona; 2010-2012)
- Northwestern Mutual Investment Services (Phoenix, Arizona; 2005-2009)
Moreover, he has passed four key securities industry qualifying exams:
- Uniform Securities Agent State Law Examination (Series 63)
- Securities Industry Essentials Examination (SIE)
- General Securities Representative Examination (Series 7)
- Investment Company Products/Variable Contracts Representative Examination (Series 6)
He is currently licensed to serve as an investment advisor in Arizona and Texas. But with the alarming number of complaints against him, should he be entrusted with this responsibility?
Legal Remedies: Where to Turn?
For those who find themselves on the receiving end of financial misconduct, relief is available. Haselkorn & Thibaut, legal experts specializing in stakeholder claims against financial advisors and investment firms, are offering free consultations for victims of financial malpractice. They can be contacted at 1-800-856-3352 or through their contact form, ensuring utmost confidentiality.
Conclusion: A Tarnished Reputation Calls for Scrutiny
In the complex world of finance, experience is often revered as a hallmark of reliability. However, Kevin Canterbury’s series of investor grievances underscore that experience alone is insufficient. Scrutiny and due diligence are imperative when entrusting someone with financial responsibilities, especially given the significant role advisors play in shaping financial futures.
With multiple grievances and significant settlements, the unfolding narrative around Canterbury provides a cautionary tale for investors and industry professionals alike. It raises the uncomfortable but necessary question: How many red flags are too many?
