Broker Joseph Jackson Faces Multiple Investor Complaints Over GWG

/ By
lady justice, legal, law

Joseph Dewey Jackson, a broker and investment adviser registered with Capital Investment Group, Inc. in Fayetteville, North Carolina, has found himself at the center of multiple investor complaints alleging misconduct related to investments in GWG Holdings. The complaints, which seek to recover losses suffered by investors, paint a concerning picture of Jackson’s sales practices and raise questions about the oversight provided by his employer.

Haselkorn & Thibaut (InvestmentFraudLawyers.com) is currently investigating Joe Jackson. Clients should call 1-800-856-3352 for a free consultation.

The GWG Holdings Connection

GWG Holdings, a financial services firm that dealt with life settlements and alternative investments, has been a source of significant controversy and investor losses in recent years. The company filed for bankruptcy in 2022, leaving many investors holding worthless or severely devalued investments in GWG’s L Bonds and other products. 

According to regulatory records and legal filings, at least one of the customer complaints against Joseph Dewey Jackson specifically alleges misconduct related to investments in GWG Holdings. The complaint, which is currently pending as a FINRA arbitration proceeding, accuses Jackson of breaching his fiduciary duty, negligence, violating the best interest regulation, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract in connection with an investment in GWG Holdings. 

A Pattern of Alleged Misconduct

While the GWG Holdings complaint is particularly noteworthy, it is not the only allegation of wrongdoing leveled against Joseph Dewey Jackson. In total, Jackson has been the subject of at least three customer complaints seeking to recover investment losses. 

One of these complaints was settled by Capital Investment Group in favor of the investor, while another filed with Ventura Securities, a former employer of Jackson’s, was denied, and the investor took no further action. 

The allegations made in these complaints range from misrepresentation of investments in annuity contracts to unsuitable recommendations to invest in alternative investments, suggesting a potential pattern of misconduct that may have caused significant financial harm to Jackson’s clients. 

Investor Recovery Options

For investors who believe they may have suffered losses due to Joseph Dewey Jackson’s actions, there are several potential avenues for seeking recovery. One option is to file a complaint with FINRA, the self-regulatory organization that oversees the securities industry. FINRA has the authority to investigate allegations of broker misconduct and can take disciplinary actions against brokers or firms found to have violated industry rules and regulations. 

However, while FINRA’s disciplinary actions can help hold brokers accountable, they do not directly compensate investors for their losses. For that, investors may need to pursue arbitration or mediation through FINRA‘s dispute resolution forum. This process allows investors to present their case against the broker or firm before a neutral arbitrator or mediator, who can award monetary damages if misconduct is proven. 
Alternatively, investors may choose to pursue legal action against the broker or firm through the court system. This option can be more costly and time-consuming than FINRA arbitration, but it may be necessary in cases where the broker or firm lacks sufficient assets to pay an arbitration award or if the investor believes that the arbitration process is unlikely to yield a favorable outcome. 
Regardless of the path chosen, recovering investment losses can be a challenging and complex process. Investors may benefit from seeking the guidance of an experienced securities attorney who can help navigate the legal and regulatory landscape and ensure that their rights are protected throughout the recovery process. 

Conclusion

The multiple customer complaints against Joseph Dewey Jackson, particularly those related to investments in the troubled GWG Holdings, raise serious concerns about the broker’s sales practices and the oversight provided by his employer, Capital Investment Group, Inc. While Jackson has not admitted to any wrongdoing, the allegations of misconduct should serve as a warning to current and former clients to carefully review their accounts for potential losses.

For investors who believe they may have been victims of Jackson’s alleged misconduct, there are several potential avenues for seeking recovery, including FINRA arbitration, mediation, and legal action. However, navigating these processes can be complex, and investors may benefit from seeking the guidance of experienced legal counsel to ensure the best possible outcome. Ultimately, the Joseph Dewey Jackson case highlights the importance of investor vigilance and the need for robust regulatory oversight in the securities industry. By holding brokers and firms accountable for misconduct and providing avenues for investor recovery, the industry can work to restore trust and protect the financial well-being of investors.

Scroll to Top