In a recent development, a customer has filed a complaint against Carlos Gomez, a registered representative of Allstate Financial Services, LLC (CRD 18272), alleging misconduct in the replacement of a variable annuity with a fixed indexed annuity. The customer claims that Gomez failed to adequately explain the implications of the switch, resulting in the loss of income from the variable annuity’s living benefit and income rider.
The complaint, filed on January 17, 2024, states that the customer was not informed that the new fixed indexed annuity did not include a living benefit rider or income rider, which were present in the original variable annuity. As a result, the customer has demanded the cancellation of the fixed indexed annuity and the waiver of surrender charges associated with the transaction.
Allstate Financial Services, LLC, where Carlos Gomez has been registered as a broker since August 28, 2009, has denied the complaint. The firm maintains that Gomez provided adequate disclosures to the customer regarding their investments and that the recommendations made by the representative were in line with the customer’s stated goals, risk tolerance, and objectives. Furthermore, the firm has found no evidence to support the claim that Gomez misrepresented any information provided to the customer.
Understanding the Complaint and FINRA Rule 2111
Table of Contents
The complaint against Carlos Gomez revolves around the suitability of the recommendation to replace a variable annuity with a fixed indexed annuity. FINRA Rule 2111, known as the “Suitability Rule,” requires brokers to have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy is suitable for the customer, based on the customer’s investment profile.
In this case, the customer alleges that Gomez did not properly explain the differences between the two annuities, particularly the absence of a living benefit rider and income rider in the fixed indexed annuity. These riders are designed to provide a guaranteed income stream for the investor, which the customer claims they lost due to the switch.
The firm, however, maintains that Gomez provided adequate disclosures and that the recommendations were suitable based on the customer’s investment profile. The outcome of this dispute will likely hinge on the evidence presented by both parties and the interpretation of FINRA Rule 2111 in this context.
The Importance of Suitability for Investors
The concept of suitability is crucial for investors, as it ensures that the financial products and strategies recommended by their advisors align with their unique financial situation, goals, and risk tolerance. When a broker recommends an unsuitable investment or fails to properly disclose the risks and features of a product, investors can suffer significant financial losses. Forbes notes that unsuitable investments can lead to substantial losses for investors, particularly when the risks and features of the products are not properly disclosed.
In the case of Carlos Gomez and Allstate Financial Services, LLC, the dispute centers on the suitability of replacing a variable annuity with a fixed indexed annuity and the alleged lack of proper disclosure regarding the loss of certain benefits. If the allegations are proven true, the customer may be entitled to recover damages resulting from the unsuitable recommendation.
This case underscores the importance of investors thoroughly understanding the products they are investing in and the potential consequences of any changes to their investment portfolio. It also highlights the critical role that financial advisors play in providing clear, accurate, and complete information to their clients.
Red Flags and Recovering Losses
Investors should be aware of potential red flags that may indicate financial advisor misconduct or unsuitable recommendations. Some warning signs include:
- Lack of clear communication about the risks and features of an investment product
- Recommendations that seem inconsistent with the investor’s goals, risk tolerance, or investment profile
- Pressure to make quick decisions or switch investments without a thorough explanation of the implications
If an investor believes they have suffered losses due to unsuitable recommendations or misconduct by their financial advisor, they may be able to recover damages through FINRA arbitration. Haselkorn & Thibaut, a national investment fraud law firm with offices in Florida, New York, North Carolina, Arizona, and Texas, is currently investigating the allegations against Carlos Gomez and Allstate Financial Services, LLC.
With over 50 years of combined experience and a 98% success rate, Haselkorn & Thibaut has a proven track record of helping investors recover losses through FINRA arbitration. The firm operates on a contingency basis, meaning they charge no fees unless a recovery is made.
Investors who believe they may have been affected by misconduct or unsuitable recommendations from Carlos Gomez or Allstate Financial Services, LLC are encouraged to contact Haselkorn & Thibaut for a free consultation by calling their toll-free number at 1-888-885-7162.
