LPL Financial Advisor Rowena Ruff Faces Pending Dispute Over Alleged Unsuitable Investment

Rowena Ruff, a broker and investment advisor associated with LPL Financial LLC (CRD# 6413), is facing a pending customer dispute filed on February 8, 2024. The complaint, lodged by a disgruntled investor, alleges that an investment made in 2014 was unsuitable for the customer’s investment objectives and risk tolerance. The investment in question is a real estate security, and the customer is seeking damages, although the specific amount has not been disclosed. Ruff, who has been with LPL Financial LLC since February 4, 2010, denies all allegations of wrongdoing and maintains that the claim is without merit.

According to Ruff, all recommendations and investment strategies made for the customer were suitable and consistent with the customer’s investment objectives and risk tolerance. She asserts that the customer fully understood all risks involved in investing in the product after speaking with her and reviewing the relevant documentation. The case is currently pending, and the outcome remains to be seen.

Haselkorn & Thibaut, a national investment fraud law firm with offices in Florida, New York, North Carolina, Arizona, and Texas, is currently investigating Rowena Ruff and LPL Financial LLC in connection with this customer dispute. With over 50 years of combined experience and a 98% success rate, Haselkorn & Thibaut has a proven track record of helping investors recover losses through FINRA arbitration. The firm operates on a “No Recovery, No Fee” basis and offers free consultations to potential clients. If you believe you have suffered investment losses due to the misconduct of Rowena Ruff or LPL Financial LLC, contact Haselkorn & Thibaut at 1-888-885-7162 for a free consultation.

Investment fraud and bad advice from financial advisors can have devastating consequences for investors. According to a Forbes article, investment fraud has been on the rise in recent years, with scammers taking advantage of new technologies and the increased accessibility of financial markets to target unsuspecting investors.

Understanding FINRA Rules and Suitability

FINRA, or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, is a self-regulatory organization that oversees the conduct of broker-dealers and their associated persons. One of the key rules enforced by FINRA is the suitability rule, which requires brokers to make investment recommendations that are suitable for their clients based on factors such as the client’s age, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance.

In the case of Rowena Ruff and the pending customer dispute, the allegation centers around the suitability of the real estate security investment made in 2014. If the investment was indeed unsuitable for the customer’s investment objectives and risk tolerance, it would constitute a violation of FINRA’s suitability rule. However, if Ruff‘s assertions are true and the customer was fully informed of the risks and the investment was consistent with their objectives and risk tolerance, then the claim may be without merit.

The Importance of Suitability for Investors

The suitability rule is a critical protection for investors, as it helps to ensure that the investment recommendations they receive from their brokers are appropriate for their individual circumstances. When a broker recommends an unsuitable investment, it can lead to significant financial losses for the investor, particularly if the investment is high-risk or illiquid.

Investors who have suffered losses due to unsuitable investment recommendations may be able to recover their losses through FINRA arbitration. This process allows investors to bring claims against their brokers and the firms they work for, and to seek compensation for the losses they have incurred. By working with an experienced investment fraud law firm like Haselkorn & Thibaut, investors can increase their chances of a successful recovery.

Red Flags for Financial Advisor Malpractice

Investors should be aware of certain red flags that may indicate financial advisor malpractice, such as:

  • Recommending investments that are inconsistent with the investor’s objectives or risk tolerance
  • Failing to fully explain the risks associated with an investment
  • Engaging in excessive trading or churning of the investor’s account
  • Misrepresenting the performance or characteristics of an investment

Recovering Losses Through FINRA Arbitration

If you suspect that you have been the victim of financial advisor malpractice, it is important to act quickly to protect your rights and recover your losses. The first step is to consult with an experienced investment fraud law firm like Haselkorn & Thibaut, which can review your case and advise you on the best course of action.

FINRA arbitration is a streamlined and cost-effective process for resolving disputes between investors and their brokers. Unlike a court case, FINRA arbitration is conducted before a panel of neutral arbitrators who have expertise in the securities industry. The process is typically faster and less formal than a court case, and the decisions rendered by the arbitration panel are final and binding.

With their extensive experience and successful track record, the attorneys at Haselkorn & Thibaut are well-equipped to guide investors through the FINRA arbitration process and help them recover their losses. The firm’s 98% success rate and “No Recovery, No Fee” policy make them a top choice for investors seeking justice and financial recovery.

As the case against Rowena Ruff and LPL Financial LLC unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the importance of working with a trustworthy and reputable financial advisor who prioritizes the best interests of their clients. Investors who have been harmed by unsuitable investment recommendations or other forms of financial advisor misconduct should not hesitate to seek the help they need to protect their rights and recover their losses.

Disclaimer: The information contained in any post on this website is derived from publicly available sources and is not guaranteed as to accuracy and often involves allegations which may or may not be proven at some point in the future. All posts are believed to be accurate as of the time of original posting, but the accuracy and details are subject to and expected to change over time and which may contain opinions of the author at the time posted.
Scroll to Top