Morgan Stanley Broker John Ross Gascoyne Under Investigation for Investment Misconduct

Financial Advisor Lost My Money

John Ross Gascoyne (Morgan Stanley, The Woodlands, TX): Comprehensive Report & Investor Red Flags

Haselkorn & Thibaut, a national securities fraud law firm, has initiated an investigation into former Morgan Stanley broker John Ross Gascoyne (CRD #1837286), previously operating in The Woodlands, Texas. If you invested with Mr. Gascoyne, we understand this may be a confusing time. This report is designed to give you clear, objective insights into his regulatory record, complaint history, and key red flags to help you make informed choices and consider your potential legal options.

Who Is John Ross Gascoyne?

John Ross Gascoyne is a former registered representative who most recently worked at Morgan Stanley in The Woodlands, TX from 2009 to 2023. As of the latest available updates, Mr. Gascoyne is not currently registered with FINRA as a broker. His professional journey included previous affiliations with major brokers:

  • Morgan Stanley, The Woodlands, TX (06/2009–01/2023)
  • Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, The Woodlands, TX (01/2009–06/2009)
  • Merrill Lynch, Kingwood, TX (1988–2009)
  • Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc. (1988)

CRD Number: 1837286

Summary Table: John Ross Gascoyne

Advisor Name CRD Number Broker-Dealer Location
John Ross Gascoyne 1837286 Morgan Stanley The Woodlands, TX

Complete List of Complaints and Regulatory Disclosures

Understanding a broker’s full background helps protect your investments. Here’s a concise overview of all known client complaints and regulatory events involving Mr. Gascoyne:

  • 2023 – Private Equity/Alternative Investments Misrepresentation (FINRA Arbitration)
    • Allegation: A customer alleged misrepresentations regarding private equity/alternative investments, related to actions between 2018–2020, while Mr. Gascoyne was with Morgan Stanley.
    • Outcome: FINRA Arbitration Case No. 23-00640. Morgan Stanley settled with claimant for $24,999 on February 21, 2025. Mr. Gascoyne was a named broker in the complaint.
  • 2004 – Unauthorized Trading and Unsuitability
    • Allegation: The customer claimed Mr. Gascoyne made unauthorized trades and unsuitable investment recommendations.
    • Outcome: The case was denied by the firm; no action taken by the customer after denial.
  • 1997 – Incorrect Tax Advice
    • Allegation: A customer said Mr. Gascoyne provided incorrect tax guidance.
    • Outcome: The complaint was settled for $15,000. No indication of further regulatory findings.

What Do These Disclosures Mean For Investors?

While not every complaint results in regulatory discipline, the appearance of multiple customer disputes on a broker’s record should prompt further due diligence and potentially a review of your own account activity. Each of these cases involved distinct allegations including:

  • Misrepresentations relating to alternative investments
  • Unsuitable financial advice that may not have fit a client’s goals or risk tolerance
  • Unauthorized trading (making investments in accounts without client consent)
  • Incorrect tax advice, possibly resulting in negative financial consequences

Regulators take these types of claims seriously, especially when they involve violations of suitability rules (FINRA Rule 2111), unauthorized account activity (Rule 3260), and commercial standards of honor (Rule 2010).

Key Red Flags Identified by Haselkorn & Thibaut

  • Multiple customer complaints over an extended career period
  • Recent settlement linked to alternative investments, which are sometimes higher risk and less transparent
  • Misrepresentation allegations, which could suggest possible communication or disclosure issues regarding investment risks
  • Claims of unauthorized trading, which should always be investigated, even if not settled in the client’s favor
  • History of settlements, signaling that at least some claims resulted in client compensation
  • No current registration with FINRA, preventing further oversight by the organization

If You Worked With John Ross Gascoyne at Morgan Stanley

Now is the right time to review your accounts. If you invested with Mr. Gascoyne, especially during his time at Morgan Stanley in The Woodlands, TX, consider:

  • Reviewing account statements for private equity, alternative investments, or unexpected trades
  • Assessing whether your investments aligned with your risk profile and goals
  • Checking for transactions you do not recognize or recall authorizing
  • Reaching out for a confidential, no-obligation legal review by Haselkorn & Thibaut

What Are Your Options Now?

Any investor who has experienced losses, or who has concerns about how accounts were handled, is encouraged to take action promptly. Dispute resolution through FINRA arbitration offers the opportunity to seek recovery for fraudulent behavior, misrepresentation, or unsuitable recommendations.

  • Time limits apply to filing claims—do not delay if you suspect wrongdoing or have suffered losses.
  • Most cases are handled on a contingency basis, meaning you only pay fees if a recovery is made.
  • Consultations with Haselkorn & Thibaut are always free and without obligation.

Why Trust Haselkorn & Thibaut?

  • Over 50 years of combined experience helping investors recover their losses.
  • 98% success rate and millions recovered for clients nationwide.
  • A professional, empathetic team that works only for investors.
  • No recovery, no fee – you pay nothing unless compensation is recovered on your behalf.

Haselkorn & Thibaut (investmentfraudlawyers.com) is committed to client advocacy and clarity. We explain your case, eligibility, and next steps in plain language and absolute confidentiality. Our goal is to achieve the maximum recovery for every client.

Get A Free, Confidential Case Review Today

If you have questions about investments placed through John Ross Gascoyne—or concerns about any advisors at Morgan Stanley (The Woodlands, TX)contact Haselkorn & Thibaut today. Call our toll-free line at 1-888-994-8066

Disclaimer: The information contained in any post on this website is derived from publicly available sources and is not guaranteed as to accuracy and often involves allegations which may or may not be proven at some point in the future. All posts are believed to be accurate as of the time of original posting, but the accuracy and details are subject to and expected to change over time and which may contain opinions of the author at the time posted.
Scroll to Top