Kestra Investment Services, LLC and financial advisor Philip Amos are facing serious allegations from clients who claim that Mr. Amos recommended unsuitable investments. The case, filed on February 20, 2024, is currently pending and has the potential to significantly impact investors who have worked with Mr. Amos and Kestra Investment Services.
The allegations revolve around the sale of direct investment products, specifically DPP & LP interests. These complex investment vehicles often carry higher risks and may not be suitable for all investors. The claimants allege that Mr. Amos failed to properly assess their investment objectives, risk tolerance, and financial circumstances before recommending these investments.
As the case progresses, it is essential for current and former clients of Mr. Amos and Kestra Investment Services to stay informed about the developments and potential implications. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching consequences for investors, including the possibility of financial recoveries for those who have suffered losses due to unsuitable investment recommendations.
Understanding the allegations and FINRA rules
Table of Contents
The allegations against Philip Amos and Kestra Investment Services center around the recommendation of unsuitable investments. In simple terms, this means that the financial advisor may have suggested investments that were not appropriate for their clients’ financial goals, risk tolerance, or investment experience.
FINRA Rule 2111, known as the “Suitability Rule,” requires financial advisors to have a reasonable basis for believing that their investment recommendations are suitable for their clients. This rule takes into account factors such as the client’s age, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance. By allegedly recommending unsuitable investments, Mr. Amos may have violated this crucial FINRA rule.
According to a Bloomberg article, investment fraud and bad advice from financial advisors are unfortunately common occurrences. In 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged former Wells Fargo executives for misleading investors, highlighting the importance of working with trusted and reputable financial professionals.
The importance of suitability for investors
Suitability is a core principle in the financial advisory industry. When investors work with a financial advisor, they trust that the professional will act in their best interests and provide recommendations that align with their financial goals and risk tolerance.
When a financial advisor recommends unsuitable investments, it can have devastating consequences for investors. They may find themselves in investments that are too risky, complex, or illiquid, leading to substantial financial losses. Moreover, unsuitable investments can derail an investor’s long-term financial plans and jeopardize their financial security.
Red flags and recovering losses
Investors should be aware of red flags that may indicate financial advisor malpractice. These red flags include:
- Recommendations that seem too good to be true or promise guaranteed returns
- Pressure to make quick investment decisions without adequate time to review the risks and details
- Lack of transparency about investment fees, commissions, or potential conflicts of interest
- Failure to provide clear explanations about the risks and characteristics of recommended investments
If you suspect that you have been a victim of unsuitable investment recommendations, it is crucial to act promptly. Investors who have suffered losses due to the actions of Philip Amos or Kestra Investment Services may be able to recover their losses through FINRA arbitration.
Haselkorn & Thibaut, a national investment fraud law firm with offices in Florida, New York, North Carolina, Arizona, and Texas, is currently investigating the case involving Philip Amos and Kestra Investment Services. With over 50 years of experience and a 98% success rate, Haselkorn & Thibaut has a proven track record of helping investors recover losses through FINRA arbitration.
Investors who have worked with Philip Amos or Kestra Investment Services are encouraged to contact Haselkorn & Thibaut for a free consultation. The firm operates on a “No Recovery, No Fee” basis, meaning that clients only pay if a recovery is obtained. To discuss your case and explore your legal options, call Haselkorn & Thibaut‘s toll-free number at 1-888-885-7162 .
For more information about Philip Amos, you can access his FINRA BrokerCheck report using his CRD number: 3262155.
As the case against Philip Amos and Kestra Investment Services unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the importance of working with financial advisors who prioritize their clients’ best interests and adhere to FINRA’s suitability rules. By staying informed and taking action when necessary, investors can protect their financial well-being and hold those who engage in misconduct accountable.
