Serious Allegation Against Broker William Hayden and Texas Securities Inc. Surfaces

In a recent development, a serious allegation has been made against William Hayden, a broker previously associated with Texas Securities, Inc. (CRD 120148) from February 23, 2021, to September 27, 2023. The customer dispute, filed on August 21, 2023, and currently pending, raises concerns about the validity of a joint venture agreement and the suitability of the investment for the client.

The Allegation and Its Impact on Investors

According to the complaint, the client, [REDACTED], claimed that the joint venture agreement was not signed by a qualified individual and, therefore, not valid. The client also alleged that the investment was not in their best interest and that manipulative methods were used to induce the purchase of the joint venture interest. As a result, the client demanded a refund of the $265,000 invested in the joint venture.

While Texas Securities, Inc. disputes the claim, stating that the agreement was signed by the appropriate parties and that the recommendation complied with Regulation Best Interest (BI), the severity of the allegation cannot be overlooked. Investors who have worked with William Hayden or invested in the oil and gas joint venture through Texas Securities, Inc. may be concerned about the validity of their investments and the potential impact on their financial well-being.

Understanding the FINRA Rule and Its Implications

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) oversees broker-dealer firms and their registered representatives to protect investors and maintain market integrity. FINRA Rule 2111, known as the “Suitability Rule,” requires brokers to have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy is suitable for the customer based on their investment profile.

In this case, the allegation suggests that William Hayden may have violated the Suitability Rule by recommending an investment that was not in the client’s best interest. If proven true, this could constitute a breach of the broker’s fiduciary duty to their client and may result in disciplinary action by FINRA.

The Significance for Investors

This case highlights the importance of working with trustworthy and ethical financial advisors who prioritize their clients’ best interests. Investors should be aware of the potential red flags that may indicate financial advisor malpractice, such as:

  • Recommending unsuitable investments
  • Failing to disclose material information
  • Engaging in manipulative or deceptive practices

If an investor suspects that they have been a victim of financial advisor misconduct, they may be able to recover their losses through FINRA arbitration. Haselkorn & Thibaut, a national investment fraud law firm, is currently investigating William Hayden and Texas Securities, Inc. in relation to this allegation.

Seeking Legal Assistance and Recovering Losses

Investors who have suffered losses due to financial advisor malpractice should consider seeking legal assistance from experienced investment fraud attorneys. Haselkorn & Thibaut, with offices in Florida, New York, North Carolina, Arizona, and Texas, has over 50 years of combined experience in successfully representing investors in FINRA arbitration cases.

With an impressive 98% success rate, Haselkorn & Thibaut has helped numerous investors recover their losses. They offer free consultations and operate on a “No Recovery, No Fee” basis, meaning clients only pay if the firm secures a recovery on their behalf. Investors can contact Haselkorn & Thibaut toll-free at 1-888-885-7162 to discuss their case and explore their legal options.

As the investigation into the allegation against William Hayden and Texas Securities, Inc. unfolds, investors must remain vigilant and proactive in protecting their financial interests. By staying informed, recognizing potential red flags, and seeking expert legal guidance when necessary, investors can safeguard their investments and hold financial advisors accountable for any misconduct.

Disclaimer: The information contained in any post on this website is derived from publicly available sources and is not guaranteed as to accuracy and often involves allegations which may or may not be proven at some point in the future. All posts are believed to be accurate as of the time of original posting, but the accuracy and details are subject to and expected to change over time and which may contain opinions of the author at the time posted.
Scroll to Top