Serious Misconduct Allegations Emerge Against Advisor Charles Fagan and Firm Raymond James & Associates

The recent allegations against financial advisor Charles Fagan and his employer, RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC., have raised serious concerns among investors. According to the pending customer dispute filed on August 15, 2023, the claimants allege that Fagan concentrated their investments in unsuitable Ginnie Mae products with long maturity dates to generate higher commissions. The claimants further claim that Fagan misrepresented these products as short-duration, safe investments and assured them that they would receive their principal investment when they needed the funds. Additionally, the claimants allege that Fagan failed to explain the risks associated with these products.

The alleged misconduct by Fagan and RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. has put $750,000 of the claimants’ investments at risk. This case highlights the importance of transparency and suitability in financial advice, as well as the potential consequences of misrepresentation and inadequate risk disclosure. Investors who have entrusted their funds to Fagan and RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. may now face significant losses and uncertainty regarding the safety and accessibility of their investments.

Understanding the Allegations

To better understand the seriousness of the allegations against Charles Fagan and RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC., it is essential to examine the key aspects of the case in simple terms. The claimants allege that Fagan:

  • Concentrated their investments in unsuitable Ginnie Mae products with long maturity dates
  • Misrepresented these products as short-duration and safe investments
  • Assured the claimants that they would receive their principal investment when needed
  • Failed to explain the risks associated with the Ginnie Mae products

FINRA Rule Violations

The alleged misconduct by Fagan appears to violate FINRA Rule 2111, known as the “Suitability Rule.” This rule requires financial advisors to have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommended investment or investment strategy is suitable for the customer, based on the customer’s investment profile. The rule also obligates advisors to make reasonable efforts to obtain and analyze information about the customer’s financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance before making any recommendations.

The Importance for Investors

The case against Charles Fagan and RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. serves as a stark reminder of the importance of working with trustworthy and transparent financial advisors. Investors must be vigilant in monitoring their investments and the conduct of their advisors to protect their financial well-being. Some key takeaways for investors include:

  • Ensure that your financial advisor fully explains the risks and characteristics of recommended investments
  • Regularly review your investment portfolio to confirm that it aligns with your goals and risk tolerance
  • Be cautious of investments that promise high returns with low risk
  • Seek a second opinion if you have doubts about the suitability of a recommended investment

Red Flags and Recovering Losses

Investors should be aware of red flags that may indicate financial advisor malpractice, such as:

  • Lack of transparency about investment risks and characteristics
  • Pressure to invest in unsuitable or high-commission products
  • Promises of guaranteed returns or low-risk, high-yield investments
  • Failure to provide regular updates or account statements

If you suspect that you have been a victim of investment fraud or misconduct, it is crucial to seek legal advice from experienced professionals. Haselkorn & Thibaut, a national investment fraud law firm with offices in Florida, New York, North Carolina, Arizona, and Texas, is currently investigating Charles Fagan and RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. They offer free consultations to clients and have a proven track record of success, with over 50 years of experience and a 98% success rate in financial recoveries for investors.

Investors who have suffered losses due to the alleged misconduct of Charles Fagan and RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. may be able to recover their losses through FINRA arbitration. Haselkorn & Thibaut can guide investors through this process and fight for their rights. With their “No Recovery, No Fee” policy, investors can pursue justice without upfront costs.

To learn more about your legal options and potential recovery of losses, contact Haselkorn & Thibaut for a free consultation at their toll-free number: 1-888-885-7162 . Visit Charles Fagan’s FINRA BrokerCheck for more information on his background and the pending customer dispute.

Disclaimer: The information contained in any post on this website is derived from publicly available sources and is not guaranteed as to accuracy and often involves allegations which may or may not be proven at some point in the future. All posts are believed to be accurate as of the time of original posting, but the accuracy and details are subject to and expected to change over time and which may contain opinions of the author at the time posted.
Scroll to Top