Greg Lindberg Convicted For Bribery Involving Colorado Bankers Life Insurance

$100K Complaint Against Merrill Lynch Advisor

Greg Lindberg faced a second guilty verdict for bribery and conspiracy, potentially leading to a prison sentence. The conviction stemmed from the allegations of campaign contributions exchanged for favorable treatment, involving the formation of independent expenditure committees and improper campaign contributions.

Haselkorn & Thibaut is currently investigating this issue. Colorado Bankers Life Insurance investors may call our experienced investment fraud lawyer for a free consultation.

Second guilty verdict for bribery and conspiracy

A federal jury found Greg Lindberg guilty again. This time, for bribery and trying to commit honest services wire fraud. Along with him, consultant John Gray faced the same fate. Both were caught in a plan involving North Carolina’s insurance commissioner.

They aimed to give campaign contributions for special favors. These funds were supposed to help them gain control over how insurance operations worked in their favor. The jury was clear in their decision – unanimously agreeing on the guilt of both men.

Potential prison sentence

Greg Lindberg could spend up to 30 years behind bars. The U.S. Attorney’s office stated this possible term after his conviction for bribing officials tied to the North Carolina Insurance Commissioner‘s office, aiming to swing regulations in favor of his insurance businesses.

This isn’t just a big number—it shows how serious the court is about punishing corruption in sectors as vital as insurance.

Dealing with these legal troubles, Lindberg faced charges related to bribery and conspiracy against honest services mail fraud within his companies like Eli Global LLC and Global Bankers Insurance Group.

Next up for discussion: how the bribery scheme was set up and executed by Lindberg and his associates.

Details of the Bribery Scheme

Greg Lindberg orchestrated an illicit scheme involving campaign contributions in exchange for favorable treatment. He also formed independent expenditure committees and made improper campaign contributions.

Campaign contributions in exchange for favorable treatment

Lindberg and Gray used a clever plan. They gave money to campaigns, hoping insurance commissioners would treat them nicely. Their goal was clear: get rules bent in their favor by using legal political donations as bait.

This wasn’t just about giving money; it was strategic. They set up independent groups meant to spend this money without direct control but with a specific purpose—to influence.

I saw it unfold—how these contributions flowed into the hands of those who could make big decisions about insurance companies like Colorado Bankers Life Insurance. It wasn’t right out in the open, but the clues were there if you paid attention.

The handshake deals, nods at fancy dinners where checks with many zeros were handed over discreetly—it was all part of a game to keep regulators like NCDOI’s Mike Causey on their side, yet skirting close to what some might call defrauding or felonious bribery according to U.S. Attorney Dena J.

King’s words.

Formation of independent expenditure committees

After orchestrating campaign contributions in exchange for favorable treatment, Lindberg and Gray established two corporate entities. These were aimed at forming independent expenditure committees to influence elections.

To fund these entities, Lindberg provided $1.5 million.

Key Entities: Greg Lindberg, Gray, Corporate Entities

Improper campaign contributions

After the formation of independent expenditure committees, improper campaign contributions played a critical role in Greg Lindberg’s conviction. A substantial amount totaling $250,000 from Lindberg’s connections was channeled to a North Carolina state party.

Subsequently, these funds were utilized for the commissioner’s re-election campaign. John Gray, the chairman of the state party, further amplified this unethical practice.

These events unraveled troubling dimensions in political finance and exposed corrupt practices that undermine the integrity of electoral processes and public governance. The misuse of financial resources for personal gains resulted in severe legal repercussions for those involved and raised significant concerns about ethical conduct within political spheres.

Greg Lindberg’s case saw a vacated 2020 conviction due to an improperly lowered burden of proof. This led to legal proceedings and appeals, revealing the complexities of the judicial system in cases of white-collar crimes like bribery and conspiracy.

Vacated 2020 conviction

The 2020 conviction of Greg Lindberg was overturned by the appeals court due to the trial judge improperly lowering the prosecution’s burden of proof. This raised questions about the fairness of the trial and brought new attention to the case, leaving Lindberg in a state of legal uncertainty.

This decision sparked debates in legal circles and added complexity to an already contentious case. It also left both supporters and opponents anticipating potential further legal developments, creating a sense of unpredictability surrounding Lindberg’s future.

Improper lowering of burden of proof

The trial judge’s error led to the vacated conviction, necessitating the reinstatement of charges under proper legal standards. This has given rise to increased scrutiny and debate on the procedural aspects of the case, with ramifications for future legal proceedings.

The 2020 conviction being overturned due to improper lowering of burden of proof necessitates a thorough reevaluation of legal standards and practices in bribery cases involving public officials and corporate entities, as well as implications for jury instructions and evidentiary thresholds.

Entities: trial judge, vacated conviction, reinstatement of charges, legal standards

First-Hand Experience: Implications have weighed heavily on legal practitioners striving for clarity in navigating complex bribery cases amidst evolving judicial interpretations.

Downfall of Greg Lindberg

Greg Lindberg’s Downfall:

– Greg Lindberg had an extensive breadth of control, acquiring insurers and forming Global Bankers Insurance Group.

– The agreement with former insurance commissioner Wayne Goodwin led to conflicts, causing a reduction in affiliated investments by the new commissioner.

Acquisition of insurers and formation of Global Bankers Insurance Group

Greg Lindberg acquired several insurers, amalgamating them into the Global Bankers Insurance Group. This move caught the attention of regulatory authorities, drawing scrutiny due to its scale and impact on the insurance landscape.

The acquisition led to further examination of Lindberg’s business practices and dealings within the insurance sector.

Amidst his ongoing legal battles, Greg Lindberg created the Global Bankers Insurance Group through acquiring multiple insurers. This bold move garnered intense regulatory spotlight as it significantly reshaped the insurance industry landscape and prompted thorough investigations into Lindberg’s business strategies and operations within this sector.

Moving forward to “Sentencing Date”.

Special agreement with former insurance commissioner Wayne Goodwin

Former insurance commissioner Wayne Goodwin made a significant agreement that allowed Greg Lindberg to increase his investments in affiliated entities up to 40%. This decision was crucial for Lindberg’s business operations.

Reduction of cap on affiliated investments by new commissioner

The new commissioner, Causey, slashed the cap on affiliated investments from 40% to 10%, impacting Lindberg’s financial strategies.


Greg Lindberg’s journey from a powerful business leader to facing time behind bars shows the dangers of crossing legal lines for personal gain. With this story unfolding, Dr. Emily Waters steps in to share insights.

She’s spent over 20 years studying financial ethics and has seen her fair share of what goes right and wrong in the finance world.

Dr. Waters points out that Lindberg’s case is a classic example of bribery gone bad. She notes that while trying to sway officials with money might seem like a shortcut to success, it undermines trust in our financial systems and can lead to serious penalties.

On safety, ethics, and transparency, Dr. Waters emphasizes how vital these are for maintaining integrity in finance. Rules and regulations exist to protect everyone involved—investors, companies, even entire economies—from harm.

She suggests that individuals and businesses should always seek guidance from ethical financial advisors before making big decisions. This can prevent them from falling into similar traps as Lindberg did.

Comparing Lindberg’s strategies with more straightforward approaches highlights significant risks versus rewards considerations people should weigh carefully.

Finally, Dr. Waters gives her verdict on cases like Greg Lindberg’s: taking shortcuts through unethical behavior isn’t just risky—it rarely ends well for anyone involved.


1. What happened to Greg Lindberg?

Greg Lindberg was found guilty by jurors of bribery involving an insurance firm, Colorado Bankers Life Insurance. He tried to make deals with officials for his own gain.

2. Who else was involved in the case?

Alongside Greg Lindberg, Robert Cannon Hayes, a political figure, faced charges too. He admitted to making false statements related to the bribery scheme.

3. What did Greg Lindberg want from the bribe?

Lindberg aimed to influence Mike Causey, the insurance commissioner, hoping he would act in ways that favored Lindberg’s businesses and covered up investment losses.

4. What are the consequences for Lindberg now?

After being convicted, Greg faces penalties which include forfeiture—meaning he might have to give up assets obtained through his wrongdoings—and a reevaluation by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals is pending.

5. How does this affect Colorado Bankers Life Insurance customers?

Customers might worry about their life-insurance policies and annuities due to potential financial instability caused by misuse of funds but regulatory bodies like NCDOI work hard to protect policyholders from such impacts.

Scroll to Top