Matthew Wilkes, a former financial advisor at TrustFirst, is facing allegations of recommending unsuitable premium-financed life insurance policies and failing to properly explain the risks involved to his clients. The claimants allege that Wilkes later made an unsuitable recommendation to change insurance providers, compounding the issue. The case, which is currently pending, highlights the importance of financial advisors providing transparent and appropriate advice to their clients.
According to the disclosure information on Wilkes‘ FINRA BrokerCheck profile, the customer dispute was filed on February 9, 2024, and the allegations specifically mention the recommendation of unsuitable premium-financed life insurance policies. The damage amount requested by the claimants has not been disclosed, and the case remains unresolved as of the filing date.
Wilkes was registered with TrustFirst (CRD 39057) in Tennessee from April 4, 2019, to October 30, 2023. He is no longer registered as a broker but maintains his registration as an investment advisor. The pending customer dispute raises concerns about the quality of advice provided by Wilkes during his tenure at TrustFirst.
Investment fraud and bad advice from financial advisors can have devastating consequences for investors. According to a Forbes article, investment fraud costs Americans billions of dollars each year, with the elderly being particularly vulnerable to fraudulent schemes and unsuitable recommendations.
Understanding Premium-Financed Life Insurance and FINRA Rules
Table of Contents
Premium-financed life insurance is a complex financial product that involves borrowing money to pay for the premiums of a life insurance policy. While this strategy can be beneficial in certain circumstances, it also carries significant risks that must be clearly communicated to clients. Financial advisors have a duty to ensure that their recommendations are suitable for their clients’ individual needs, risk tolerance, and financial objectives.
FINRA Rule 2111, known as the “Suitability Rule,” requires financial advisors to have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy is suitable for the customer. This rule takes into account the customer’s investment profile, which includes factors such as age, financial situation, risk tolerance, and investment objectives. By allegedly recommending unsuitable premium-financed life insurance policies, Wilkes may have violated this crucial FINRA rule.
The Importance of Suitable Recommendations for Investors
Investors rely on the expertise and guidance of their financial advisors to make informed decisions about their investments and financial strategies. When advisors recommend unsuitable products or fail to properly explain the risks associated with a particular investment, it can have severe consequences for the investor’s financial well-being.
Unsuitable recommendations can lead to significant financial losses, as well as the loss of trust in the financial advisory relationship. Investors who have suffered losses due to unsuitable recommendations may be entitled to recover damages through FINRA arbitration or other legal means.
Recognizing Red Flags and Seeking Legal Assistance
Investors should be aware of potential red flags that may indicate financial advisor malpractice or unsuitable recommendations. These red flags can include:
- Recommendations that seem too good to be true or promise guaranteed returns
- Pressure to make quick decisions or invest in products that are not well-understood
- Lack of transparency regarding fees, commissions, or potential risks
- Recommendations that do not align with the investor’s stated goals, risk tolerance, or financial situation
If an investor suspects that they have been the victim of financial advisor malpractice or unsuitable recommendations, they should consider seeking legal assistance. Haselkorn & Thibaut, a national investment fraud law firm with offices in Florida, New York, North Carolina, Arizona, and Texas, is currently investigating the allegations against Matthew Wilkes and TrustFirst.
With over 50 years of combined experience and a 98% success rate, Haselkorn & Thibaut has a proven track record of helping investors recover losses through FINRA arbitration. The firm operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning they charge no fees unless they successfully recover funds for their clients.
Investors who believe they may have been affected by the alleged misconduct of Matthew Wilkes or other financial advisors at TrustFirst are encouraged to contact Haselkorn & Thibaut for a free consultation by calling their toll-free number at 1-888-994-8066.
As the case against Matthew Wilkes unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the importance of working with trustworthy and transparent financial advisors who prioritize their clients’ best interests. By staying informed and vigilant, investors can protect themselves against unsuitable recommendations and seek legal recourse when necessary.
