Alfred S. Vanderlaan (CRD #1172406) — WestPark Capital Broker Sanctioned by FINRA

Alfred S. Vanderlaan (CRD #1172406) — WestPark Capital Broker Sanctioned Over
GWG L Bonds

Haselkorn & Thibaut, P.A., operating as Investment Fraud Lawyers, represents retail investors who lost money after working with Alfred S.
Vanderlaan (CRD #1172406). In January 2025, FINRA sanctioned Vanderlaan for unsuitable recommendations of speculative GWG L Bonds. If you were a Vanderlaan customer and suffered losses, you may have a FINRA arbitration claim.

Who is Alfred S. Vanderlaan?

Alfred Sietze Vanderlaan, CRD #1172406, is a former registered representative based in Watertown, South Dakota. His BrokerCheck report discloses a long history of customer complaints and regulatory events.

Background detailRecord
NameAlfred Sietze Vanderlaan
CRD number1172406
Most recent firmWestPark Capital, Inc. (CRD #39914)
Dates at WestPark CapitalMay 20, 2019 – June 2, 2022
Prior firmsSandlapper Securities, LLC; CapWest Securities, Inc.
Current statusNot currently registered with any FINRA member
Customer complaints13 disclosed disputes (8 final, 5 pending as of early 2025)
Pending alleged damagesMore than $600,000 across five pending complaints

What FINRA found

On January 22, 2025, FINRA issued an AWC (Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent) in Case #2021070498106. The AWC found that Vanderlaan willfully violated Regulation Best Interest and FINRA Rule 2010.

FindingDetail
ViolationReg BI Rule 15l-1(a)(1) and FINRA Rule 2010
ProductGWG L Bonds — speculative, unrated corporate bonds issued by GWG
Holdings
CustomersTwo retail customers, including a senior citizen, with moderate risk
tolerance
HarmCustomers held more than 20 percent of their liquid net worth in
alternative investments
CommissionsVanderlaan received approximately $6,508 in commissions
Fine$10,000 deferred fine
Restitution$6,508 to customers, plus interest
SuspensionThree months, February 3, 2025 through May 2, 2025

GWG Holdings filed for bankruptcy in April 2022. The GWG L Bonds were illiquid and high-risk. FINRA concluded that the recommendations were not in the customers’ best interests because they did not match the investors’ risk tolerance, age, or financial goals.

Pending customer complaints

In addition to the FINRA AWC, Vanderlaan faces five pending customer disputes filed in 2023. These complaints allege breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, failure to supervise, and violation of Reg BI.

Complaint dateAlleged damages
March 21, 2023$315,000
June 16, 2023$50,000
June 30, 2023$105,000
July 28, 2023$40,000
September 26, 2023$100,000

The total pending alleged damages exceed $600,000. The claims focus on unsuitable GWG L Bond recommendations.

Common allegations in
Vanderlaan cases

Investors who worked with Alfred Vanderlaan have raised several recurring claims:

  • Unsuitable recommendations. GWG L Bonds were too

    risky for customers seeking growth and income.
  • Overconcentration. Customers placed more than 20

    percent of their liquid net worth into alternative investments.
  • Failure to disclose risks. The bonds were unrated

    and issued by a company that later filed for bankruptcy.
  • Failure to supervise. WestPark Capital allegedly

    failed to detect or prevent the unsuitable sales.
  • Violation of Reg BI. The recommendations

    prioritized broker commissions over customer best interests.

What Reg BI requires

Regulation Best Interest became effective on June 30, 2020. It requires brokers to act in the best interest of retail customers when making recommendations. The rule includes four core obligations:

ObligationWhat it means
DisclosureProvide full written disclosure of all material facts and
conflicts
CareExercise reasonable diligence to understand the product, risks, and
customer profile
Conflict of interestIdentify and mitigate conflicts that could affect the
recommendation
Complianceestablish policies to comply with Reg BI

Vanderlaan’s case centers on the Care Obligation. FINRA determined that he did not use reasonable diligence to make sure the GWG L Bond recommendations fit the customers’ investment profiles.

What WestPark Capital
was required to do

Broker-dealers are responsible for supervising their registered representatives. WestPark Capital was required to:

  • Review customer-specific suitability documentation
  • Monitor concentrated positions in speculative products
  • Supervise alternative investment sales
  • Train advisors on Reg BI obligations
  • Investigate red flags such as customer complaints

FINRA separately cited WestPark Capital for failing to establish a reasonably designed supervisory system for Reg BI until September 2024, despite regulatory guidance issued in 2021 and 2022.

How investors can recover
losses

If you lost money in GWG L Bonds or other investments recommended by Alfred Vanderlaan, you may be able to recover through FINRA arbitration. FINRA arbitration is typically faster than court litigation and is the required forum for most brokerage customer disputes.

Typical evidence includes:

  • Brokerage statements showing GWG L Bond purchases
  • Private placement memoranda or offering documents
  • Suitability questionnaires
  • Correspondence with Vanderlaan or WestPark Capital
  • Account records showing concentration percentages

How Investment Fraud
Lawyers can help

Haselkorn & Thibaut, P.A., operating as Investment Fraud Lawyers, reviews broker misconduct cases at no cost. We work on a contingency fee basis: no recovery, no fee. If you invested with Alfred Vanderlaan or another WestPark Capital representative and have concerns, call us at 1-888-885-7162 or use our confidential contact form.

Legal disclaimer: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique, and recovery depends on the specific facts, applicable law, and available defendants.

Related resources

Disclaimer: The information contained in any post on this website is derived from publicly available sources and is not guaranteed as to accuracy and often involves allegations which may or may not be proven at some point in the future. All posts are believed to be accurate as of the time of original posting, but the accuracy and details are subject to and expected to change over time and which may contain opinions of the author at the time posted.
Scroll to Top