Investment Fraud Lawyers

Investment Fraud Lawyers is led by founding partners Jason S. Haselkorn (FL Bar No. 52140) and Matthew R. Thibaut (FL Bar No. 514918) of Haselkorn & Thibaut, P.A. Former Wall Street defense attorneys and previously licensed securities brokers, they now represent individual investors nationwide in FINRA arbitration and securities litigation. The firm focuses on investment fraud and securities cases involving broker misconduct, unsuitable recommendations, and fraudulent schemes, with an approximately 98% success rate across hundreds of matters and more than 95 years of combined securities law experience. From offices in Florida, New York, Arizona, Texas, and North Carolina, the firm typically handles investor cases on a contingency‑fee basis — there is no attorney’s fee unless a financial recovery is obtained.

Sanctuary Securities Fined For GPB Capital Sales

Sanctuary Securities Fined by FINRA Over GPB Capital Sales (David A. Noyes & Company)

Sanctuary Securities Inc. is the latest casualty of the irregularities over the private placement sale of offerings sponsored by GPB Capital. As per the letter of settlement made available by the self-regulating organization (SRO), it has been fined $60K by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) for the sale of GPB Holdings II LP and […]

Sanctuary Securities Fined by FINRA Over GPB Capital Sales (David A. Noyes & Company) Read More »

10 Cons of Non-Traded REITS

10 Cons of Non-Traded REITS – Recover Your Losses

Regulators — the SEC, FINRA, and many state securities authorities — have repeatedly cautioned that non‑traded REITs and non‑traded BDCs are complex, often costly, alternative investments. Over the years their messages have been consistent: these products can be difficult for retail investors to understand, they can carry hidden or structural conflicts, and their long‑term economics

10 Cons of Non-Traded REITS – Recover Your Losses Read More »

Rauch Pease Wealth Management

Wells Fargo Advisor Rauch Pease Wealth Management Asked to Pay $731K Plus Interest for Churning

It has been determined by the arbitrators in a FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) arbitration case that Wells Fargo, along with a former financial adviser Gregory Pease, are guilty of churning in a customer’s account and must pay $731,587 as compensation. The Claim The claim was filed by Edward A., the chief executive of Owens

Wells Fargo Advisor Rauch Pease Wealth Management Asked to Pay $731K Plus Interest for Churning Read More »

Scroll to Top