Haselkorn & Thibaut, P.A., operating as Investment Fraud Lawyers, has opened a formal investigation into recent allegations against Jacksonville, Florida financial advisors Alex Intriago (CRD# 6333662) and Angela Fettik (CRD# 4710729), both registered with Wells Fargo. This action is in response to a substantial investor complaint alleging unsuitable investment recommendations resulting in claimed damages of $10 million. If you invested with these advisors and experienced significant losses, we encourage you to contact our firm at 1-888-885-7162 for a free, confidential consultation.
Background: Who Are Alex Intriago and Angela Fettik?
Both advisors serve as registered brokers and investment advisors with Wells Fargo in Jacksonville, Florida. Here is a brief overview of their backgrounds and credentials:
Advisor: Alex Intriago
CRD#: 6333662
Licenses: Series 7, 66
Years Experience: 12
Current Firm: Wells Fargo (since 2018)
Other Registrations: 53 state licenses; Prior: M Holdings Securities
Advisor: Angela Fettik
CRD#: 4710729
Licenses: Series 7, 63
Years Experience: 22
Current Firm: Wells Fargo (since 2015)
Other Registrations: 29 state licenses; Prior: Morgan Stanley, Raymond James, Citigroup
Both advisors are registered as brokers and investment advisors and, according to public records, have extensive experience and multi-state licensure, reinforcing the trust investors may have placed in them. However, our investigation highlights several concerning points detailed below.
Overview of the $10 Million Suitability Complaint
According to BrokerCheck and supplemental public sources, both Alex Intriago and Angela Fettik have been accused by a former client of recommending unsuitable investments between 2020 and 2025 while representing Wells Fargo in Jacksonville, Florida. The pending complaint, filed in June 2026, seeks $10 million in damages, alleging that the advice these advisors provided did not align with the client’s investment profile or needs.
Key points of the complaint include:
– Recommendation of investments allegedly not suitable for the client’s age, financial status, or risk tolerance
– Failure to conduct sufficient diligence into the client’s needs and objectives
– Potential pattern of unsuitable advice or transactions, rather than isolated incidents
This matter is currently pending and underscores the critical importance of brokers adhering strictly to FINRA’s suitability rule, FINRA Rule 2111, which requires comprehensive analysis and a reasonable basis to believe that each investment recommendation is appropriate for the client’s unique circumstances.
What Is FINRA Suitability and Why Does It Matter?
Brokers and investment advisors registered with Wells Fargo and other institutions are bound by FINRA Rule 2111, a stringent standard designed to protect clients from unsuitable investment advice. This rule mandates that advisors:
– Thoroughly evaluate a client’s investment profile
– Assess factors such as age, net worth, investment objectives, risk tolerance, income, and more
– Apply a two-step process:
– Is there a reasonable basis for recommending the investment or strategy for any investor?
– Does it make sense for this particular investor?
– Monitor patterns, ensuring even a series of individually suitable transactions are not, when aggregated, excessive or harmful
If you believe your financial advisor failed to meet this duty and you experienced significant losses, you may have grounds to recover your funds.
Red Flags and Complaint History: Alex Intriago & Angela Fettik
Our research into both advisors’ regulatory and complaint histories reveals matters of note for potential claimants:
Alex Intriago (Jacksonville, FL)
Regulatory Actions: None reported
Customer Complaints: Pending 2026 suitability complaint — $10 million claimed
Civil/Criminal Litigation: None reported
FINRA Investigations: None listed
Web-Search Findings: No reports or major news articles
Angela Fettik (Jacksonville, FL)
Regulatory Actions: None reported
Customer Complaints:
– Pending 2026 suitability complaint — $10 million claimed
– 2019: Closed complaint (unsuitable recommendation); no payout
Civil/Criminal Litigation: None reported
FINRA Investigations: None listed
Web-Search Findings: No reports or major news articles
Additional notes:
– Angela Fettik: Her record shows one prior, minor customer complaint in 2019 for alleged unsuitability, which was closed with no payout. This may indicate a pattern, even if past allegations were not substantiated.
– Alex Intriago: No previous complaints until the current major action.
What to Do If You Suffered Losses with These Advisors
If you entrusted your savings to Alex Intriago or Angela Fettik at Wells Fargo in Jacksonville and experienced unexpected or excessive losses, we believe you deserve answers. Our attorneys have seen firsthand how unsuitable investment advice can erode retirement plans and life savings. Our firm brings:
– 98% success rate across hundreds of investor claims
– 95+ years of combined securities law experience
– Over $520 million handled in securities matters
– Top 2% ranked (Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent)
– Super Lawyers designated
– 5.0-star client ratings
– No recovery, no fee — you only pay if we recover your funds
Drawing on our insider knowledge as former Wall Street defense attorneys, we aggressively advocate for investors harmed by financial advisor misconduct. We are currently investigating the full extent of potential recoveries regarding the allegations against Alex Intriago and Angela Fettik of Wells Fargo, Jacksonville, Florida.
Your Next Steps: Free Consultation and Case Review
Recovering your funds after investment losses caused by unsuitable advice is possible. If you have questions concerning your options or want experienced advocates in your corner, contact us now at 1-888-885-7162 or through our website for a confidential, no-obligation case review. Our attorneys stand ready to fight for your recovery and hold negligent advisors accountable.
We invite you to take this critical step toward recovering your losses.
